beta
Text
1. The part of the judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded by this court, against the Defendants is as follows.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 6, 2013, the network D driven a G vehicle owned by the Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant’s side”) at the front intersection in F-si E at F-si, Ma on October 6, 2013, and shocked the I vehicle for H driving (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s vehicle”).
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
In the instant accident, the victim J, a passenger boarding the Plaintiff’s vehicle, suffered from the injury of “sleep knee, knee-free standing room, open standing room for entering the Plaintiff (second week’s stability room),” and “slick-gu for the left-hand side of the upper-hand side,” (three slick-gu connecting the upper-hand side with the lower-hand side of the upper-hand side) and was issued a medical certificate on October 7, 2013.
C. On October 16, 2013, the Plaintiff, the mutual aid business operator of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, agreed to pay KRW 2.6 million to the victim J on the instant accident.
- The Plaintiff stated that the above KRW 1,552,746, as calculated error, stated the above KRW 1,548,567 as KRW 1,548,567.
- : The calculation of the amount of the personal agreement paid by the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff of KRW 624,914,00, the amount of compensation for business suspension - the amount of compensation - the amount of compensation 624,914 - the amount of compensation paid by the Plaintiff of KRW 180,00 is as follows.
Meanwhile, Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant C Co., Ltd.”) subscribed to “A personal compensation for automobile insurance,” but the said insurance contract was set forth as the scope of compensation under Article 5(1) of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and Article 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act.
(e) Of the injury of the injured party J, the right side of the upper left side of the injured party falls under class 1-3 of the attached Table 1-2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Automobile Loss Compensation Act, and the remainder of the injury falls under class 9 of the attached Table 1.
F. Defendant insurance company: (a) on February 26, 2014, KRW 1,193,470 as the amount of indemnity to the Plaintiff.