1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part concerning the principal lawsuit shall be modified as follows.

The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim).

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance is modified as stated in the following 2; and (b) it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except to supplement or add the judgment as stated in the following 3. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Revised parts

A. 14 pages 2 of the 14th two pages “The Plaintiff entered into the instant agreement with the Defendant as follows, and the operating profit ratio compared to the sales of the year 2012, which the Plaintiff started to sell the instant product, is 6.63%, and 6.55% of the net profit ratio compared to the sales; and

B. 14 Under the 14th day, the 6th day “2013 Plaintiff’s 2013” was modified as follows: 6.55% of the net income rate for the year 2012 and 2013.

(c) an average of 4.43% [6.5% + 2.31%)/2] by adding the following to the right side of 5:

(d) revise “Cumulative” under fourteen (14) below to “settlement”;

(e) revise the “rate of net profit per party” under 14 below to the “rate of net profit per party”.

(f) 3,158,214 won (=(820,315,474 won x 0.0231) ± 6,056,662 won (820,315,474 won x 0.0231)/6 months for a two-month period below:

(g) 15 pages 2 and 3 “31,582,140 won (=3,158,214 x 10 months)” as follows: 60,56,620 won (=6,056,662 won x 10 months)

(h) revise “30 million won” of 15 pages to “50 million won”;

I. The following is added to the 15th 10th 15th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 2th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 10th 200.