1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part concerning plaintiffs A, B, C, D, and E shall be modified as follows.

The defendant is the plaintiff A, B, C, and

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows, and the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding a judgment as stated in the following three paragraphs, thereby citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of

2. Revised parts

A. Five (5) Under the five (2) below, the Plaintiff C and A delegated the authority to the same effect to eight (8), including the modified C, to the last two (3) conduct “C”, and the Plaintiff C and A delegated the authority to sell the instant land from H props to the Defendant on March 29, 2007.

(b)a modification of “4,161,087,500 won” for 14 pages to “4,161,037,500 won”;

C. From January 10, 2011 to January 11, 2011, the 14th 11st 12th 11 transferred “The 1,190,900,000 won in total as indicated in [Attachment Table 1] was remitted to 21 H props from January 10, 201 to January 11, 201 as follows.

From 15 up to 7,8 PP 15, including the Defendant and the Plaintiffs, for the following reasons, revised the content of the instant agreement and agreed on March 23, 2012 to pay 4,161,037,500 won and delay damages for the second site and 15 personal accounts of HP 15, respectively, in proportion to the amount of claims of the PP 15, respectively.

(e) modify “Agreement” to “Agreement” in the following 15 pages:

F. 17 Their 17th three acts were to be paid by the following revision, and 6 H props were to be paid by the following revision. 6 H props are all related to the conclusion of a sales contract.