The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The grounds for the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, are the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the modification of the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited as it is

2. Revised parts

A. At the second bottom, the “corporation” is a modified legal entity as follows, and the Z is a person who plans and produces music records in the trade name “AG”.

(b)from 4 up to 7 e.g. “in 000,000”:

(c) for the result of the violation of paragraph (c) above four (4) below, Eul shall be fully responsible for civil and criminal liability and shall pay 50 million won (a contract deposit, a record production and public relations charge) as required by Gap.

5 5. Beginning 5.000’’’ in front of the “Phonogram Sales Agreement”

E. The former Copyright Act (wholly amended by Act No. 8101 of Dec. 28, 2006; hereinafter the same) amended by 11 pages as follows:

(f) add “No. 7” to “No. 6” of 11 on the following 3 pages:

G. According to the facts and facts found in the judgment below, the plaintiff and the Z determined that the Z will own the right of the author's work (referring to the work relating to the author's, artist, music, singing, and other entertainment activities) by the plaintiff's entertainment activities through an exclusive contract (Article 1 (b)). During the exclusive period, the plaintiff must comply with the Z's request, the completed work shall be owned, used (Article 1 (c)) by the Z, and the completed work shall not be used for any purpose whatsoever (Article 2 (c)), and the plaintiff shall not pay part of the profits accrued from the sale of the records of this case to the plaintiff (Article 4 (c)). The plaintiff at the time of the production of the records of this case.