Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is in a relationship with juvenile F (n, 16 years of age).

No person shall induce, induce, or compel another person to buy sex of a child or youth.

On December 2, 2016, the Defendant: (a) ordered F to engage in sexual traffic; (b) decided F to cover the cost of living with the cost of sexual traffic; (c) decided F along with F to engage in sexual traffic as if the Defendant was F; and (d) decided the time and place of engaging in sexual traffic as if the Defendant was F; and (c) decided F to engage in sexual traffic in the place of sexual traffic.

As such, the Defendant sent out from the 16th day of the same month to the south-party B, who purchased the sex at the 18:00 square village in Bupyeong-gu Incheon, Bupyeong-gu, Incheon, by using G and J, and, as if F, induced the above B to buy the sex of juveniles, and induce the said B to buy the sex of juveniles, and then the Prosecutor stated the price for the purchase of the written indictment as “170,000 won” on the same page. However, according to Articles 13 and 57 of the investigation record, the Defendant is obvious that it is a clerical error of “200,000 won” and thus, is corrected as above.

B, from December 29, 2016 to December 29, 2016, the sexual traffic price was paid five times in the same manner as indicated in the list of crimes, and the sexual traffic price was paid to other sex buyers, and had them sexual intercourse with F.

As a result, the defendant induceds the purchase of sex from children and juveniles.

2. Defendant B became aware of the youth F (age 16) through “G”, a smartphone-making app, and decided to provide money and goods and to provide sexual intercourse.

On December 16, 2016, at around 18:00, the Defendant stated 200,000 won as the price for the purchase of the written indictment in the “Icom’s Mour’s w” room located in Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu, Incheon. However, according to the 13 and 57 pages of the investigation record, the Defendant is obvious that it is a clerical error of “200,000 won” and thus, it is corrected as above.

(b).