logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.08.09 2017고단654
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 8, 2014, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1,50,000,000 from the same court as a fine for the same offense in the case of violation of Road Traffic Act at the Gangseo branch court of the Chuncheon District Court.

On May 12, 2017, the Defendant started from the parking lot in the Southern City of Gangseo-si without a driver's license on May 12, 2017, and driven B rocketing-III car in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.112% at the intersection of the 3km bathing beach located in the same city of transmission.

The Defendant, who was punished by drinking not less than twice as above, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again, and was driving a motor vehicle without a license at the same time.

2. The Defendant, at the same time and at the same place as above 1. Paragraph 1., was subject to request for signature on the “report on the situation of the driver in charge,” which was controlled by drinking driving at the same place, and was conducted by the police officer affiliated with the Gangnam Police Station C District, and the Defendant’s statement of driver’s opinion” column of the above document, forged the “report on the circumstances of the driver in charge of driving in the State” under the name of E, which is a private document concerning the rights and duties and proof of facts, for the purpose of exercising his signature, by stating the name of the Defendant’s pro rata in the “E” column, and used it by delivering the forged “report on the circumstances of the driver in charge of driving in the State” to the said D, who was aware of the forgery.

3. The Defendant forged a private signature and signed the above investigation at the same time and at the same place as the above 1. paragraph 1., caused a policeman to enter the personal information, details of violation, etc. in the column for entering the traffic information of drinking driving by accessing DA (port portable lighting) to the traffic police computer network, and forged E’s private signature without authority for the purpose of exercising the signature “E” in the column for signing the offender at the same place.

arrow