A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year and six months from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 26, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of the alcohol level of 0.138% in blood without a vehicle driver’s license on the violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) and the Defendant driven BM 6 automobiles at the section of approximately 1km in the section of approximately 1km in the part of the Han-day, U.N., U.N., in the same Dong and Dong, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.138% in blood while driving a vehicle.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act at the same date and place as Paragraph 1, and at the same time and place, the Defendant provided a resident registration number (F) of the type E, which was going to the rest of ordinary influence D, in order to be punished for aggravated punishment due to drinking driving and non-licenseing driving, in the process of regulating drinking from C Assistant Inspector D in the Busan Coastal Police Station C Assistant Inspector D, and used another person’s resident registration number unlawfully.

3. The Defendant forged a private document, or carried out the said investigation document at the same time and at the same place as Paragraph 1, and, for the purpose of exercising the duty to control driving under the influence of alcohol by obtaining a request for signing and sealing the E’s name in the column for the driver’s statement of the driver’s opinion, the Defendant entered and signed the E’s statement without authority, which is a private document pertaining to factual proof, and issued the written report on the driver’s circumstantial statement of the driver’s own under the name of the E, which is a private document, to a slopeD who may know of the fact, as seen above, as if the written report on the driver’s circumstantial statement was duly formed.

4. The Defendant forged a private signature, and signed the above investigation, signed the signature of “E” in the signature column for confirmation of the fact of crackdown on driving alcohol at the police PDA short horses, which was entered for the purpose of uttering at the same time and place as Paragraph 1, and forged the signature of “E”, and used the forged E’s signature by allowing a police officer, who is a traffic-related police officer, to inquire about the crackdown on driving alcohol of E by transmitting it to the traffic police computer network for registration.

Summary of Evidence

1..