logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.11 2014고단5887
상해등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 6,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A

A. On June 29, 2014, around 00:50 on the front day operated by the injured party E (n, 52 years of age) in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, the injured Defendant caused the Defendant’s wife, who was sitting on the top of the top lid for the advertisement of the singing in the influence of alcohol, and caused the Victim’s left face one time, thereby causing the Victim’s injury to the left-hand side requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment.

B. On June 29, 2014, from around 00:50 to 01:00 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the Defendant’s disturbance, such as entering No. 1’s paragraph (a) from around 00:50 on June 29, 2014 to 01:0 on the same day, which read, “I will have no way to do business.” The Defendant interfered with the entry of customers by getting out of the disturbance, such as “I will have no way

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the victim's singing operation by force.

C. On June 29, 2014, at around 01:50 on June 29, 2014, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s friendship B to visit the said district; (b) assaulted the police officer of the said district to arrest the flagrant offender as a suspect of the obstruction of performance of official duties; (c) assaulted the Defendant’s left-hand arms on the part of the police officer of the said district; (d) assaulted the Defendant’s left-hand arms on the part of the police officer of the said district; and (e) assaulted the Defendant’s arms on the left-hand knife of the said district; and (e) assaulted the Defendant’s arms on the part of the police officer belonging to

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. On June 29, 2014, at around 01:35, the Defendant visited the said district group by hearing the fact that Defendant-friendly A was arrested as a flagrant offender at the place specified in paragraph (1)(c) of the same Article. However, the Defendant visited the said district group by the police officers belonging to the said district group, “Salgora, inasmuch as the district cost is complicated and is undergoing the investigation of the instant case,” is not believed to believe that the Defendant “Walra is a police officer” to the police officers belonging to the said district group or K.

The police officer of the I Area is also the police officer of the I Area.

arrow