logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.06.26 2015고단1911
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1,000,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A 피고인은 2015. 4. 29. 20:40경 서울 양천구 C, 지하1층에 있는 D노래방 앞에서 노래방 운영자인 E을 폭행한 사실에 대한 신고를 받고 출동한 서울양천경찰서 F지구대 소속 경찰관인 G(44세)으로부터 피의자 권리를 고지받고 현행범인으로 체포를 당하자 위 경찰관에게 “야 이 씨발 놈아, 내가 누군지 아냐, 가만두지 않겠다.”라고 욕설을 하며 발로 경찰관의 정강이를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a flagrant offender by a police officer.

2. Defendant B

A. At the above date, at the above time and place, the victim G (the age of 44) who is a police officer belonging to the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station, attempted to arrest the birther A as a flagrant offender, and the singinger’s operator and his name are not known, the said Defendant publicly insulting the victim by publicly insulting the victim “I am off and her frien. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I.).”

B. On February 29, 2015, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act: (a) around 21:15, the Defendant, while drunkd in the I districts located in Yangcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, J and police officers, who were workers in the earth’s situation, expressed a bath, such as “this Chewing, rings,” etc. to K, and (b) around 45 minutes of alcohol or slick at the government offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol of the police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the respective Acts and subordinate statutes of E and L;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 311 of the Criminal Act (in the case of insult), Article 3(3)1 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act (in the case of the government office’s revocation), and selection of each fine

1. Defendant B from among concurrent crimes: former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant B of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow