logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.04.03 2014나47315
건물명도
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

Reasons

1. The reasons why this Court has used for this case are as follows: each “this Court” shall be dismissed as “court of the first instance”; the second “building” of the second and 17 and 18 of the judgment of the first instance shall be dismissed as “former Building”; except for the second and second parts of the 10th to 14th to 12th 9 of the judgment of the first instance as follows; therefore, the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is the same as that of the part of the judgment of the first instance, and it shall be cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The part of the previous construction site” 【(B) The damages suffered by the Plaintiff due to nonperformance of the duty to return the previous building of this case. ① The Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas under Restricted Development Zones (hereinafter “Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas under Restricted Development Zones”) due to the loss of the right to interest.

Comprehensively taking account of the provisions of Article 12 (1) 1 (e), a building may not be constructed or altered in a development restriction zone in principle: Provided, That the construction of buildings prescribed by Presidential Decree as facilities for the residence, living convenience and livelihood of residents in a development restriction zone may be conducted with permission from the Special Self-Governing City Mayor, the Special Self-Governing Province Governor,

Meanwhile, attached Table 1 of Article 13(1) of the Enforcement Decree of the Development Restriction Zone Act

5. In the case of “a house for residential, living convenience, and livelihood of residents in a development restriction zone”, the requirement of establishment of the so-called right of relocation requires “a house for the residential, living convenience, and livelihood of residents in a development restriction zone.” Article 3 of the Framework Act on Agriculture, Fisheries, Rural Community and Food Industry is as follows: “A house is newly constructed only on the land, the land category of which is large from the time of designation of the development restriction zone (in the case of a building where there was a reduced building, the owner of the land is different from the owner of the building) and on the land, which

arrow