(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고단6003

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.13 2014고단6003

상해

Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,00, and a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On April 11, 2014, from around 10:00 to around 11:00, Defendant A suffered injury, such as plucking up the victim’s hand, plucking up the victim’s hand, and plucking up the victim’s 35-day medical treatment for approximately 35 days on the right side part of the 4-day water table.

2. In the process of vision as above, Defendant B assaulted the Victim A (A, 66 years of age) by pushing the Victim A with her chest by hand.

Summary of Evidence

[Fact 1]

1. Statement made by witnesses B in the third protocol of the trial;

1. A medical certificate of injury (No. 4 of evidence) (the fact of No. 2 at the time of sale);

1. The defendant B's partial statement in the second protocol of trial;

1. The entry of a witness A in part of the third protocol of trial;

1. Defendant B’s defense counsel in the police statement statement statement statement as to Defendant B asserts that there is no supporting evidence in addition to Defendant B’s statement.

Reinforcement evidence is sufficient if it can be recognized that the confession of the defendant is not processed, but it is sufficient to prove that the confession of the defendant is true. Although the victim did not make a statement about the same assault damage as the above crime, there was a physical exercise of force against the defendant as at the time of the instant case to the effect that he was subjected to assault against the defendant for drinking. In full view of the defendant's statement and A, the above assertion is acceptable, since it is a criminal fact as stated in the judgment No. 2.

Defendant

B The defense counsel also asserts that the defendant's act constitutes self-defense or legitimate act, but when comprehensively considering the defendant's statement in the investigation agency, the defendant's act was pushed down with the victim's fry on the ground that the victim's fry fry had sexual intercourse with the victim's fry, and thus it cannot be viewed as self-defense or legitimate

Application of Statutes

1...

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 2013.04.26 2012고정2872

-부산지방법원 2013.11.07 2012고정4225

-울산지방법원 2015.10.15 2015고정660

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2019.05.09 2018고정402

-부산지방법원 2015.11.13 2014고합39