Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

At around 21:25 on June 12, 2012, the Defendant and C meta with the victim on the ground that the victim F(33 years of age) and G, who is a cafeteria, are in front of the E cafeteria located in Busan Gu, on the ground that “the young far, who is the young farc, is the young farc,” and that “C is the young farc,” and that “C is the young farc, who is the young farc,” the victim’s farc with his farc, and the Defendant farced the victim’s farc with his farc, and the Defendant farceded the victim’s farc, by combining it.

As a result, the Defendant and C jointly inflicted injury on the victim's dynasium, tension (e.g., dynasium), and crynasium damage on the victim's 14-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and F;

1. Partial statement made by C of a witness in the third protocol of trial;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc. of Specific Crimes, Article 27 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. 가납명령 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 관한 판단 피고인 및 변호인은, 피고인의 행위가 정당방위 또는 정당행위에 해당한다는 취지로 주장하나, 위에서 거시한 증거들에 의하면 피고인이 피해자의 엄지손가락을 꺽은 사실을 인정할 수 있는바, 이는 소극적인 방어행위를 넘어 공격의 의사를 포함하여 이루어진 것이고, 또한 사회상규상 허용되는 행위에 해당한다고 볼 수 없으므로 정당방위 또는 정당행위에 해당한다고 보기 어렵다.

Therefore, the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion is without merit.