Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and six months.

Defendant

A 50,000,000 won shall be additionally collected.

Defendant

A. A.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant A, at around 22:00 on May 1, 200 on the first day, at around 22:00, Defendant A promised to receive KRW 100,000,00 as the case of loan brokerage by requesting the executives and employees of the Financial Supervisory Service to provide loans from the K and B at the J Studal Center located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, “M (MN).” In relation to the performance, the O’s contribution fee of KRW 2.3 billion is required. In addition, Defendant A promised to receive KRW 100,000 as the case of loan brokerage.

Defendant

A around July 31, 2009, when the above K and B obtained a credit loan of KRW 2.50 million from the Japanese Savings Bank under the name of (ju) P, operated by them, from the Japanese Savings Bank, as the above N performance, A demanded to change the amount of KRW 100 million as above, and received a transfer of KRW 50 million to the national bank account in the name of Q, which is the account designated by Defendant A, through the (ju) P Corporation account around August 1, 2009.

As a result, Defendant A received KRW 50 million for the arrangement of loan business belonging to the duties of officers and employees of financial companies.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s statement in the third protocol of trial;

1. Each statement made by a witness B (defendant A) and by a witness R in the tenth protocol of the third protocol of trial;

1. The witness Q from among the fourth trial records and the witness S from among the 12 trial records; and

1. Statement K in the third protocol of suspect examination of Defendant A by the prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of statement against K, T, and U;

1. Investigation report (Evidence Nos. 19,86)

1. Certificate of deposit transaction performance [No. 17], reply to a request for financial transaction information [Evidence No. 18, 20, 27, 28, 35] Defendant A and his/her defense counsel denies criminal facts as indicated in the judgment, but the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court is considered as a whole.