Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 21, 2017, around 20:13, the Defendant: (a) neglected to care so as to avoid harming a hotly implied national water because he/she knows that another customer is waiting after being scambling at the cafeteria 2’s cafeteria; (b) neglected to do so; (c) neglected to return to his/her own 3/4 of 3/4 with hot water, thereby damaging the floor of the implied national water; and (d) caused the water of the State to touch the victim E’s bridge.

As a result, the defendant suffered a video of the victim on the following legs, knee knee knee knee 1 per the number of days of treatment.

2. Defendant B is the proprietor of the above “D” restaurant.

The Defendant had a duty of care to attach warning phrases to 85 to 90°C with an implied national water temperature, and to attach a flusing material safety tool to a flusent part of the flusent hand, or to keep a flusent dispute with a flusence, because the Defendant knew that the flusing of the national water is high in the heat rate of the heat with a studs lease material, thereby harming the string of the national water, thereby harming the strus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not attach a warning phrase to an implied cos, and did not attach a stringer with a strong heat rate to the stringer lease, or did not have a stringer with a stringer with a strong heat rate, and thereby caused the victim E to suffer a video of one percent per the number of days of treatment on the following bridge, strings, and knee-face, as stated in the above 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written statement;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. A medical certificate or request for medical treatment;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes accompanying five photographs; and

1. Defendant A who has the relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment against the crime: Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act; Defendant B who has the option of a fine: Article 268 of the Criminal Act and the choice of a fine;

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69 of the Criminal Act.