logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.06.18 2015고단2246
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2015, at around 07:45, the Defendants: (a) prevented Defendant A from assaulting F and assaulting F at the point of E, located in Busan Northern District, and (b) I expressed a desire to assault F; (c) I and I expressed a desire to assault F; and (d) I and I expressed a bath to the G District in the Busan Northern Police Station G District; and (d) I and I sent the Ha’s chest on a one-time basis; and (e) B and I expressed a drinking bridge on two occasions.

Accordingly, the police officers arrested Defendant A as a flagrant offender, resisting the arrest of Defendant A as a flagrant offender, Defendant A resisted Defendant A into the Republic of Korea, and Defendant B took the left arms of I and took the face of Defendant B with the wheels to take the hand-on with the hand-to-beh, one time, and caused damage to the victim I to the right shoulder and arms that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

As a result, the Defendants conspired with the above police officers to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time they jointly inflicted an injury on the victim I.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F, I, H, and J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Articles 257 (1), 136 (1), and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Article 40 of each Criminal Code, among the defendants;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act:

1. The sentencing guidelines cannot be applied as they are, since there are conceptual concurrences with the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order.

In light of the fact that the victim I agreed with the victim A, the defendant A is the first offender, and the defendant B has no other criminal record in addition to the punishment imposed once by a fine due to the crime of fraud, and the fact that the crime is closely against the victim.

arrow