Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

On June 2, 2012, from around 11:45 to 12:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) received a successful bid for the “U.S. 1 S. dollars 1” owned by the victim D from the office of the viewing hall at the Guluri-dong Office at the Guluri-si, 390-1; (b) around April 17, 2012, at the Internet auction site at the Internet auction site, the currency collector, and made the victim contact with the said money; (c) by soliciting the victim to drive the vehicle again and enter the vehicle of the victim, the Defendant took a flusium 100 U.S. dollars 1,000,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 2,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won 1,000 won .

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by witnesses D in the second protocol of the trial;

1. Copy of the complaint;

1. Recording records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal affairs (attaching a sample photograph of a damaged article), and to report internal affairs (verification of whetherCCTV is installed and operated, etc.);

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Selection of Punishment for the Crime. Article 329 (Selection of Fine)

1. The Defendant asserts that the Defendant’s assertion of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act on the inducement of a workhouse did not appear to have committed the above crime and thus, the Defendant’s assertion was detained.

Therefore, the statement of the victim not only is specific and consistent, but also the defendant did not have been in the safe office that had been returned to the victim by moving or parking the vehicle to the victim, and the reason is good, and the victim respondeded to the toilet. The victim was stolen by a third party between the two persons.