The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The defendant in the grounds of appeal is only an unilaterally assaulted by the victim, and there is an error of mistake of facts in the judgment of the court of original judgment which judged otherwise in the absence of the enemy when the victim was committed.

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, the defendant: (a) although recognizing the fact that the defendant was shaking, the victim was pushed ahead of her head, and (b) the victim was faced with the defendant's stairs during the process of smugglinging the defendant out of the place; (c) in this case, the defendant was sealed with plastic chairs; (d) the victim was fright above her head; (e) the defendant was boomed in the process of suppressing the victim; and (e) the defendant was boomed with her head; and (e) the defendant was boomed with her head; and (e) the defendant took away from her head; and (e) the defendant was boomed with her head; and (e) the police officer who was called to be a customer G upon receiving a report, stated that "the defendant was boomed by her leader; and (e) when the police investigation was conducted, the victim was boomed by her leader of the defendant; and (e) when the defendant was made a statement.

On the other hand, the statements of the victim are very specific and consistent, each statement of G conforms to the victim's statement as a whole, the fact that the defendant also recognized the fact that the defendant had been able to provide money from the victim's wife, and the defendant found the victim's room to receive money from the victim's wife, and the victim was the victim for business obstruction, and at the time the customer was the customer.