The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant merely caused a person who is deemed to have a steel product and did not have the victim's head as a steel product, but otherwise, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.

2. The following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below: ① The victim E, from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, stated consistently to the effect that “the victim she ended with the F and has come to the beer by having come to the beer of the iron system; ② the victim made a concrete and natural statement about the reason why the defendant was placed at the time of the crime and the situation sent back to the hospital after the crime; ③ The defendant saw that the victim she went to the beer of the injury; ② The victim stated that “the victim she was unable to make a witness in the circumstance where the victim she made a statement in the circumstances where she made a statement to the effect that “the victim she made a statement to the effect that she had not been able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to be able to.”

Therefore, the court below found the Defendant guilty of the facts charged of this case.