1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the amount ordered to be paid below shall be cancelled.

1. The Plaintiff filed a complaint with Cental clinic (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) operated by the Defendant in order to receive dental treatment on July 12, 2006 in the state where the Plaintiff only remains in the face of the upper right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and right and the right and the right and the right and the right

Around July 27, 2006, the defendant performed an artificial bones 0.75 g on the plaintiff's upper right side of the plaintiff's Hak on the day of internal origin, performed an operation to transplant the artificial bones 0.5 g on the left side of Hakakakak, and completed the treatment by connecting each of the 1, 2 soften on the right side of Hakakak, 1, 207, on the 1, 2007, on the 1, 2007 upper right side of Hakak, 1, 2 Daegu on April 4, 2007, on the 1, 2007 upper right side of Hakak, 12 bits on May 3, 2007, and after completing the treatment of scrap by connecting each of those parts on the upper right side of Hakakak, optopy, and rup on Nov. 7, 2007.

(2) On February 25, 2008, the Plaintiff started to appeal to the pre-treatment book from April 4, 2007, and on February 6, 2008 and February 21, 2008, the Defendant discovered abnormal tissues from the Plaintiff’s upper right side, and performed an operation to remove them, but on February 25, 2008, the abnormal organization still is an abnormal organization and the pain is not proven, and the Plaintiff removed the eggs planted on the Plaintiff’s upper right side side of the nives and the nives on March 4, 2008, and then took measures for electric power generation hospital on March 12, 2008.

On March 16, 2008, the Plaintiff complained of pains at the lower end and the right lower end, and applied to the emergency room of the Jeonnam University Hospital on March 17, 2008, and the doctor in charge determined on March 17, 2008 that, after the Defendant’s computerized shooting of the floor to the Plaintiff on March 17, 2008, the fluor was buried into the lower end and the lower end and the lower part of the fluoral part of the fluoral part of the 1,2 mouth,1,2 Daegu, 2 Daegu, 2 Daegu, 2, and 2, and then the fluoral damage was caused to the lower part.

The physician in charge is minor to the negoal damage.