Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 15, 2018, the Defendant forged private document: (a) at the Dong 5 Dong 5 Dong dong community center located in 686 pursuant to the Dong dong dong dong 2018, the Defendant’s mother, on October 18, 2018, indicated “B” in the name column of the mandator, “B” in the resident registration number column, “C” in the resident registration number column, “C” in the address column, “bank submission” in the name column, “A” in the agent name column, “A” in the name column, and “A” in the above mandator’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a letter of delegation to issue a certificate of seal imprint in B, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph (1) above, exercised the power of proxy to issue a forged certificate of seal imprint as if it were a document duly formed, at the same time, and at the same time and place as indicated in paragraph (1) above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation (including attached documents);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (to telephone conversations who is the complainant, and verification of death B);

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that an act that does not violate social norms is merely for the purpose of forging and using a certificate of seal impression issued in the name of the child born by the defendant under the name of the deceased is merely for his/her economic interest and procedural convenience. Article 20 of the Criminal Act requires legitimacy of motive or purpose, reasonableness of means or method, balance between protected interest and infringed interest, urgency and supplement.