logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2020.02.06 2019고단5977
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a foreigner of Vietnam's nationality and is staying in the Republic of Korea as a woman with marriage immigration (F-6).

1. Around March 2019, the Defendant: (a) indicated that the Defendant would pay KRW 7.60,00 to “C”, the alien registration certificate, the alien registration certificate, the certificate of entry into and departure from Korea, and the verification photograph; (b) requested that he/she create the Vietnam driver’s license while transmitting the passport, alien registration certificate, the certificate of proof; and (c) the forged operator who received it from “A”, the name of “A,” the birth date,” the nationality “VIEM,” the date of issuance “VEM,” the issuer’s “F, G, and H (the Director-General of the Vietnam Ministry of Transportation”)” and sent the Defendant by mail one copy of the Vietnam driver’s license by printing the Defendant’s photograph.

Accordingly, the Defendant, in collusion with the above C, forged a driver’s license in the name of the Vietnam Transportation Bureau, which is a private document regarding a certificate of fact.

2. On March 6, 2019, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for the exchange of a foreign driver’s license with an employee in charge of issuing a forged vehicle driver’s license at the Incheon driver’s license test site located in Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City; (b) submitted the forged vehicle driver’s license to the employee in charge of issuing a foreign driver’s license; (c) submitted the forged vehicle driver’s license as a genuine establishment; (d) obtained a domestic driver’s license from the employee in charge; and

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged private documents, and thereby interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of the public official in charge of issuing driver's license by fraudulent means.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Domestic History Report (Confirmation of Forgery A’s Offense), Data to Inquiry into the Register of the Suspected A’s Driver’s Licenses, and A’s License for the Suspected A.

arrow