logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.07.04 2018구합81042
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

A school juristic person B is a school juristic person that establishes and operates a C Middle School (hereinafter referred to as “instant school”), and the Plaintiff is a male teacher who was newly appointed as a teacher of the instant school on September 15, 199 and served as a sports teacher.

On March 23, 2018, the teachers' disciplinary committee of the school foundation B resolved to dismiss the Plaintiff as the grounds for the following disciplinary actions, and the school foundation B dismissed the Plaintiff on the same day.

(hereinafter “Dismissal of this case”). 1. Facts constituting grounds for disciplinary action are suspected of having reported the investigation of the school violence case at the school of this case:

(a) An inappropriate physical contact with the victim that embucked off the victim’s malm, sing off his mack, macking his macks, macking his macks by putting his macks into a less part of his macks, with his macks, macks, sacks, kacks, kacks, kacks, kacks, kacks, kacks, etc.;

Use of language that could be seen as a verbal sexual harassment - Movement out of panty when doing so.

b. It may be possible to prepare any snow anywhere because of her butt.

Madern, etc.

3. The evidence and judgment accused person's investigation report on school violence cases committed by the plaintiff, the notification of the commencement of criminal investigation and the request for cooperation in investigation, the notification and instruction of public officials in violation of the Act on the Office of Education in the Seoul Dongjak-gu Office of Education, and the notification of the disposition results of the case committed by public officials in the Seoul Central District Public Prosecutor's Office (private school teachers) and the contents of the statement are

4. According to the reasoning of the judgment below, the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff’s ground of appeal pointing out that the Plaintiff

arrow