logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2019.11.20 2018구합1536
교원소청심사위원회결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the decision of this case

A. From March 1, 2016, the Plaintiff has served as a Dhigh school teacher operated by school juristic persons B (hereinafter “B”) (hereinafter “B”).

B. On May 4, 2018, the Superintendent of the Daegu Metropolitan City Office of Education demanded a heavy disciplinary action (Removal) on the ground that the Plaintiff committed the following acts:

A discipline accused person (Plaintiff) is appointed as a teacher to a school juristic person B on March 1, 2016, and is in charge of providing education on the English subject at D High Schools, and should establish an educational ethics awareness as an educator and instruct students with learning ethics and knowledge thereon.

(Article 14 of the Framework Act on Education; and Article 14 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act shall educate students in accordance with the curriculum provided by the Acts and subordinate statutes (Article 20 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act). In addition, Article 4 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and Subordinate Statutes, such as the Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts and Subordinate Statutes, shall observe Acts and subordinate statutes and perform faithfully the duties, and shall not do any act detrimental to the dignity regardless of whether it

Nevertheless, a discipline accused person violated the curriculum such as informing students of his experience in sexual traffic and his site for sexual traffic during the class hours, and operated very inappropriate lessons as follows, and committed an act that severely damages the dignity of a teacher by causing the inappropriate harm to students by using a secret, telephone, or speech.

1. On August 18, 2017, a discipline accused person (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”) conducted very inappropriate classes, such as informing students of his/her sexual traffic experience and sexual traffic site (hereinafter “Disciplinary Reason 1”), said, during the Hong Kong trip’s English class hours between the 2nd and 5th of August 18, 2017, that he/she was faced with the experience that he/she was faced with and “the sex trafficking in Hong Kong is the conformity of the law.” On his/her street north, he/she searched him/herself as “the Hong Kong night culture” into the B, thereby going to the Bro

arrow