On November 5, 2019, the Defendant received five days of internal education for the Plaintiff, two hours of special education, and special education for guardians.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff and D are students who were enrolled in Cmiddle School established and operated by school foundation E at the time of 2019 (hereinafter “instant school”).

B. On July 17, 2019, the Plaintiff filed a report on school violence (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s report on school violence”) with the purport that “D sent his sexual organ to the instant school library on June 17, 2019 and forced him to go to the toilet.”

C. On August 12, 2019, the instant school reported the Plaintiff’s report on school violence to the Busan Western Police Station.

On September 17, 2019, the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence in the instant case (hereinafter “the instant autonomous committee”) held a meeting to discuss the Plaintiff’s handling of school violence reports, but decided to re-convenate the Autonomous Committee on Countermeasures against School Violence as a result of the police investigation on the ground that each of the claims is too excessive and cannot be determined.

E. On October 15, 2019, the Busan Coast Guard rendered a disposition of closure of internal investigation on the ground that there is no evidence of crime except a statement in conflict with the Plaintiff’s report on school violence.

F. On October 22, 2019, D reported school violence to the instant school with the effect that “self-infinites did not commit any indecent act against the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff talked with another student who was sexually indecent act, and damaged his honor by reporting school violence to the instant school.”

G. Accordingly, the instant autonomous committee held a meeting on October 31, 2019 and resolved on each of the following measures against the Plaintiff for the following reasons (hereinafter “instant disciplinary cause”).

D In June 2019, the Plaintiff asserted that he committed an indecent act against the Plaintiff in this case’s school library and toilets, and the case is too excessive in investigating the Plaintiff in this case’s school.