1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 8, 2016, the Plaintiff visited Cental division operated by the Defendant, a dentist, (hereinafter “instant dental surgery”). B. The Plaintiff’s 21 space where the Plaintiff’s spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spahn (hereinafter “12 spawn”), spawn spawn (hereinafter “11 spawn”), and spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn span spawn spawn spawn swn spawn span swn spawn swn span s.

C. On September 9, 2016, the following day, the Plaintiff visited the instant dental license again, 11, 12, and 22, and opened a temporary fluoria, and fluoria was carried out on December 6, 2016, with the temporary fluoria produced on December 6, 2016.

On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the instant dental surgery to the effect that food was great between the Plaintiff and the dental surgery. On December 20, 2016, the Defendant, on December 20, 2016, allowed the Plaintiff to temporarily see two patients.

The Defendant created a steel scrap with the shape of the Plaintiff’s choice (the upper and lower end of contact) and administered it to the Plaintiff on December 27, 2016.

E. On January 7, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to newly manufacture the scrap metal because it was unable to satisfy the shape of a shot in the form of contact with the upper end. On January 7, 2017, the Defendant signed on the following written consent (hereinafter “instant written consent”) and produced a new scrap metal and conducted a procedure on January 19, 2017.

A

F. Even after performing a new procedure as above, the Plaintiff visited the instant dental license several times on the ground that the height of visible scrap or the decline of visible scrap.