1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of retrial shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, ..

Basic Facts

The following facts are no dispute between the parties or evident in records:

The Plaintiff’s medical records and the Plaintiff visited Cental division (hereinafter “instant dental treatment”) operated by the Defendant, a dentist, on September 8, 2016, to treat infants more than 21 in a state where there is no one, with a view to treating infants. The Plaintiff’s 21 space was narrow so that the Plaintiff’s 21 space was in a state in which the Plaintiff could not be heartd with a normal fluor, and accordingly, the Defendant was informed the Plaintiff of the expenses incurred in fluoring the fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, the upper fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor (hereinafter “11”) and the upper fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor (hereinafter “22 fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluoral fluor, and then notified the Plaintiff of the expenses incurred in fluoral fluc.

On September 9, 2016, the following day, the Plaintiff visited the instant dental license again, followed by 11, 12, and 22 dental services, and carried out temporary dental services on December 6, 2016, with a flusium (b) manufactured on December 6, 2016 (a part of the flusium, a part of the flusium, and a shape covering the upper part of the flusium).

On December 14, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the instant dental surgery to the effect that food was great between the Plaintiff and the dental surgery. On December 20, 2016, the Defendant, on December 20, 2016, allowed the Plaintiff to temporarily see two patients.

The Defendant created a steel scrap with the shape of the Plaintiff’s choice (the upper and lower end of contact) and administered it to the Plaintiff on December 27, 2016.

On January 7, 2017, the Plaintiff requested the Plaintiff to newly manufacture the scrap metal because it was unable to satisfy the shape of the blicking shape with the upper end. On January 7, 2017, the Defendant signed on the following written consent (hereinafter “instant written consent”) and produced a new scrap metal and conducted a procedure on January 19, 2017.

Even after performing a new procedure as above, the Plaintiff gets higher or lower the height of the scrap metal.