1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant ordering payment in excess of the amount ordered below.

Basic Facts

From August 11, 2009 to March 14, 2014, the Plaintiff is a person who has undergone the cream operation at the “Dental” located in Seo-gu Daejeon District Court (hereinafter “instant hospital”).

The defendant is a dentist operating the instant hospital, who has performed the above treatment.

On August 11, 2009, the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s condition, was first admitted to the instant hospital on the part of the Defendant, and was consulted with the Defendant on the following: 12, 16, 17, 21, 25, and 27 of the Plaintiff’s crypt operation among the Plaintiff’s crypt operation, and the crypt operation for the crypt operation for the crypt in 11.

At the time, the Plaintiff was in mind of the boomage from 12th dental surgery to 21th dental surgery, and there was no boomer (16, 17, 25, 27) on the left and right side, and the brush was in a state when brush was brupted.

On the other hand, at the time of consultation, the plaintiff's defect that the plaintiff smokes tobacco, and the defendant recommended the plaintiff that the patient administering the flapt should stop smoking.

As a result of the reading of the Plaintiff’s radiation X-ray conducted by the Defendant’s hospital in the course of treatment on the part of the Plaintiff’s 16 and 17 dental surgery on August 20, 209, when the height of the dental frame on the upper left and right side of the Plaintiff’s 16 and 17 dental surgery was conducted by the Defendant on August 20, 209 on the part of the Plaintiff’s 16 and 17 dental surgery, and was conducted on March 12, 2010 on the part of the Plaintiff’s fluoral surgery.

From July 22, 2010 to September 27, 2010, the Defendant completed the Plaintiff’s yellow iron of 16,17 as to the father of the patha.

However, when the plaintiff inhales food, the plaintiff complained of the above pain, and there is any defect that the plaintiff saw and smells around the above part, the defendant provided the plaintiff 16 to seven times on the part of the plaintiff 16 from August 5, 2010 to May 19, 201, and five times on the part of the plaintiff 17 to five times on the part of the baby.

However, the plaintiff's 16, 17 Mono. 17 is shaking on the part of the flag.