logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2018.12.20 2018고단4663
공문서변조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2018, the Defendant altered official documents, at his own house located in the Dobong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment B apartment 1806 dong 308, 2018, and entered the number of the disabled vehicle sign column issued by the head of Dong 2 of Nowon-gu for the purpose of exercising, into “C” by using the official stamp color on the site.

Accordingly, the defendant changed the name of the disabled car sign in the name of the second head of Nowon-gu, a public document.

2. Around October 27, 2018, the Defendant: (a) parked his/her vehicle at the parking lot of the branch hospital located in 68 in the Korean-U.S., Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, while holding an altered official document; (b) kept one disabled parking sign in the name of the second head of Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, on the front glass of the said vehicle, as if he/she were issued a true copy of the disabled parking sign in the name of the second head of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Investigation report (as to whether to confirm the original register of motor vehicle registration and whether to register a disabled motor vehicle), the original register of motor vehicle registration;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the Internet citizen newspaper and accusation site;

1. Article 225 (Occupancy of Alteration of Official Documents) and Article 229 (U.S. of Alteration of Official Documents) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The crime of this case’s reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act with the suspended sentence cannot be deemed to be minor as an act that may cause substantial inconvenience to the disabled persons.

However, in light of the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects the crime, and that it is not a relatively heavy official document, the defendant's age, sex, environment, motive and consequence of the crime, and other circumstances shown in the arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, the punishment as ordered shall be determined.

arrow