A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 23, 2017, the Defendant altered official documents: (a) deleted C from the vehicle number column of the disabled vehicle sign issued by the Seosan market for the purpose of exercising at the Defendant’s house located in Jinjin-si B; and (b) written D using a black four-dimensional pen on the spot.

In this respect, the defendant modified a chapter on the disabled vehicle sign in the name of the Seosan market, which is an official document.

2. On December 23, 2017, the Defendant: (a) parked a motor vehicle with a disability in the area of parking of persons with disabilities located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which is located in 134, with a 14:26 sign of the altered official document; and (b) exercised it by means of keeping the disabled vehicle sign that altered as described in paragraph (1) on the front glass of the said motor vehicle, as if it was actually issued, as if it was actually issued.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the motor vehicle registration ledger and each investigation report (including documents attached to motor vehicle photographs and other documents);

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of altered official documents), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of modified official documents);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, including the fact that there are circumstances to consider the motive for the instant crime, the fact that there is no same kind of force, etc., and other circumstances favorable to or unfavorable to the Defendant as shown in the pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, career, health status, and family relation, were determined as ordered by comprehensively considering the overall