A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Around October 2016, the Defendant changed official documents entered the “D” in the vehicle number column of the disabled vehicle sign issued under the name of the head of Dong C for the purpose of uttering at the Defendant’s office located at the end of Jeju, and entered “D” in the vehicle number column of the disabled vehicle sign issued under the name of the head of Dong.

Accordingly, the defendant altered a sign of the disabled vehicle, which is an official document.

2. On April 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) parked the Defendant’s DSS5 car parking zone in Jeju International Airport Disabled Persons with Disabilities at the airport at the Jeju Airport at the airport at the Jeju Airport at the Jeju Airport on April 22, 2017; and (b) held the altered car sign at the front glass of the said car, as if it was issued genuinely as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. On-site photographs and a list of reported cases;

1. Notice of imposition of fines for negligence for unlawful use of disabled motor vehicle signs;

1. Application of answer statutes requesting cooperation in investigation;

1. Article 225 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (a point of altered official documents), Articles 229 and 225 of the Criminal Act (a point of uttering of altered official documents);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is the disabled automobile sign for the disabled who is the socially weak, and its nature is not good.

However, the fact that the defendant is recognized to commit the crime, the mark of the disabled in 2009 as the disabled in the class 6 degree, but the revision of the law in 2010 does not constitute the above qualification any longer, the altered document was used once, there is no record of crime except that which was punished by a fine in light of fraud in 2007, and the punishment shall be determined as ordered in consideration of various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, sexual behavior, environment, background of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc.