1. The appeal by the plaintiff (appointed party) and the extension and additional claims by this court are dismissed, respectively.

2. Costs of appeal.

1. The reasons why this Court stated in this part of the underlying facts are the same as the part of “1. Basic Facts” in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for the reasons for further reorganization, determination, and dismissal as follows. As such, they are included in the summary thereof in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(a) Nos. 8, 15, and 9 of the first instance judgment shall be followed as follows.

As to the share of each land of this case, B.B.

After the conclusion of each contract for club agreements and each sales contract, the holders of the ownership in the register have been changed on several occasions.

On August 16, 2018, which is the date of closing argument in the appellate trial, the current status of the holders of co-ownership shares in each of the instant lands around August 16, 2018 are as follows:

Specifically, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), AH, and Selected (Partial Successors) share 56/672 shares in joint maintenance, Defendant H has 641.44/134 shares, Defendant H has 116/672 shares, AI's 26.56/134 shares, AJ and AK (the representative director of Defendant I) shares 50/672 shares, and AL has 66/672 shares.

(A) No. 56/672, Jul. 25, 2014, Defendant H. 2, 2014, Defendant H. 2, No. 56/672, Jul. 25, 2014, Defendant H. 50/672, Jul. 4, 2014, Defendant H. 50/673.4/1, 344 Defendant H. 26.56/1, 344, Jun. 20, 2018 (former equity right holder: Defendant 26.56/6/1, 344, AI No. 1444, Feb. 14, 2008)