logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.06 2016구합287
정직3월처분및징계부과금부과처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. From January 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013, the Plaintiff served with the Daegu Metropolitan Office of Education (hereinafter “Tgu Office of Education”) B, and is a public educational official who served as the Chigh School administrative office from July 1, 2013.

B. From July 7, 2014 to July 18, 2014, the Ministry of Education conducted a comprehensive audit of the Daegu Office of Education on the Daegu Office of Education, and on November 18, 2014, the Daegu Office of Education issued a request for disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, a person in charge of the instant BOT project (hereinafter “D”) on December 10, 2012 (hereinafter “instant BOT project”) to grant permission to change the use of the sports site directly used for the educational activities for the purpose of students’ use as basic property for profit-making of sports site in E-China and high schools related to the implementation of the instant BOT project (hereinafter “instant change of use”).

C. Accordingly, on June 30, 2015, the Defendant demanded a resolution of heavy disciplinary and disciplinary charges on the ground of the Plaintiff’s “faith and breach of the duty of integrity.” However, on July 27, 2015, the Daegu District Personnel Committee of the Office of Education decided on the Plaintiff’s disciplinary action for KRW 2 months of salary reduction and KRW 65,500 (1) of disciplinary charges, and notified the Defendant.

The defendant on August 12, 2015.

In addition to the grounds for the Ministry of Education's request for disciplinary action, a request for disciplinary action under paragraph (1) has not been considered to be a combined request for disciplinary action, and on the ground that the excessive work could not be a reason for normal participation, the plaintiff is not a reason that D is a combined request for disciplinary action. The reason is that the excessive work cannot be a reason for normal participation.

arrow