logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.10.15 2019구합68108
감봉처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff was newly appointed as a teacher of the Jeonnam Elementary School on April 26, 1983. On March 1, 2015, the Plaintiff is a public educational official who was appointed as the principal of the Ansan Elementary School (hereinafter referred to as the “instant school”) from March 1, 2018 to February 28, 2019.

On June 20, 2018, the Gyeonggi-do Office of Education received a civil petition to the effect that "the plaintiff made an improper business instruction to the school staff and performed a quality act" through the national newspaper on June 20, 2018, the audit was conducted from July 2018 to September 2018.

On November 20, 2018, the defendant requested a minor disciplinary decision against the plaintiff to the Gyeonggi-do General Disciplinary Committee for Public Officials (hereinafter referred to as the "Disciplinary Committee") on the ground that the plaintiff violated Article 56 (Duty of Good Faith), Article 58 (Prohibition of Deserting Office), Article 61 (Duty of Integrity) and Article 63 (Duty of Integrity Maintenance) of the State Public Officials Act and Article 10 (Prohibition of Intervention, etc.) of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials of Gyeonggi-do Office of Education (Prohibition of Receiving Money and Valuables, etc.) and Article 16 (2) of the Code of Conduct for Public Officials of Gyeonggi-do.

On November 30, 2018, the Disciplinary Committee passed a resolution on the disposition of reduction of salary for 1 month and one copy of the disciplinary charge (the target amount of 16,920 won) against the Plaintiff on the following grounds, and accordingly, on December 14, 2018, the Defendant issued a disposition of reduction of salary for 1 month and one copy of the disciplinary charge (the target amount of 16,920 won) against the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

(1) The Plaintiff is superior to the employees of the administrative office, regardless of their ordinary duties, by ordering them to prepare for the point of attendance at the latest due to the cooking of the dissolved (such as divers, small clothes, etc.) purchased from the business operating expenses for the purpose of providing them to the employees of the administrative office, such as giving them an instruction to the employees of the administrative office on out-of-the-job preparation (e.g., fooding on the board) of the date of their attendance at the latest due to the lag, labing of conventional lag, washing of lag, washing of la

arrow