The defendant is not guilty, and the summary of the judgment of innocence is publicly notified.

1. The Defendant and the Victim C (Nam and 47 years old) worked in E located in the Republic of Korea, and the Defendant are the chief of the organizational department of the labor union of the Democratic Labor Group under the Democratic Labor Group in E (hereinafter referred to as the “ Democratic taxi for convenience”) and the victims are the chairman of the labor union of the Republic of Korea under the Labor Group in E (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea taxi for convenience”).

On July 11, 2014, around 15:00, the victim sought to find a democratic taxi office in E in order to resist the chairperson of a democratic taxi, while the victim took a dispute with the defendant, who was in the place, in order to resist the chairperson of a democratic taxi.

Therefore, the victim saw that he did not see that he was able to prevent the victim, and he saw the defendant's left side at once.

When the Defendant came from the victim in line with the above her head, the Defendant suffered from the victim’s left face face with his head, and inflicted injury on the victim, such as damage on the victim’s character, which ought to be treated for about two weeks.

2. Determination

A. As evidence submitted by the prosecutor in relation to the above facts charged, there are statements made between the victim and witness F in the investigative agency and this court, photographs of damaged parts, and written diagnosis of injury.

B. Meanwhile, the Defendant consistently asserted from the investigative agency to the above court that he or she did not use violence against the victim only, and that he or she did not use it.

C. In full view of the victim’s consistent statement in the investigation agency and this court, and the investigation agency F of the witness in the Korean taxi witness in the Republic of Korea (However, in the police, the police is replaced by the victim’s face, and in the prosecutor’s office, there is a little difference in the contents of the statement) and the statement in this court, as shown in the facts charged of the instant case.