The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

On September 30, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 22:30 on September 30, 2013, the Defendant: (b) was unable to bring the Defendant a disturbance with the victim D’s female-friendly job offers E in return for the payment of money; (c) the Defendant was unable to bring the Defendant to the front of the house; and (d) while the Defendant was in the city with the victim, the Defendant was satisfying the part below the left-hand side of the treatment days; and (d) the Defendant was satisfying the part below

Judgment

Defendant

In addition, the defense counsel consistently asserts that there is no fact that he/she has committed violence against the victim's arms from the victim by consistent investigative agencies to this court.

Therefore, it is difficult to believe that the victim's statement is not reliable because it is contrary to witness F, G's statement and other circumstances recognized by evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, although there are D's investigative agencies and this court's statement and injury diagnosis statement as evidence that seems to correspond to the facts charged. However, considering the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, it is difficult to believe that the victim's statement is not reliable.

In addition, it is not enough to recognize the defendant's injury, such as the written charge, to the extent that it is beyond a reasonable doubt.

In the statement of the victim, the victim stated in the investigative agency and this court that "the defendant left the upper part of the left arms in the past where he and she do so, the defendant was pushed down and pushed down the police, and at that time, he did not go beyond the latter and sustained the image due to the cigarette smoking."

However, the police officer F, who was called upon at the time of the report, was called up after receiving the report at the time, D and the defendant were not in a state, and D and the defendant got out of the apartment, and when waiting for the representative engineer, the defendant was landed.

The defendant and D have expressed their desire mutually, and the defendant was her boomed from D.

After the defendant has been faced with a boom.