logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.11.29 2018고정1157
업무방해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged: (a) on February 14, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for approximately five minutes, under the influence of the victim’s desire to read “Clocks and Clocks” in the “Dlocks” operated by the victim C in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si; (b) other customers listen to, and (c) other customers.

2. The victim and E’s statements and CCTV images generated as evidence that seem to correspond to the facts charged in the instant case are located.

The victim has been found 6 to 7 times in the investigative agency without the defendant's attempt from the P.M. date.

The Korean government made it possible to change alcoholic beverages into credit and made it possible to do so.

It was impossible to operate the business without paying more money.

B. L. L.D. did not interfere with it.

At the same time, the police officer sent a report to the police and sent it to the future, and the police sent it to the future.

At night, at night 11, he or she was found to be under the influence of alcohol, and then reported again, by taking the desire to enter a pair of stoves, etc.

“E,” and “E, an employee, has been found two to three times while under the influence of alcohol by the Defendant.”

The President proposed that he did not go to his match alcohol or flin, and that the President had the other table flicked the flicker and flicked the flat.

The voice of the defendant is very high.

The president sent the Defendant out of the door, the Defendant was unable to do so, and the police continued to have continued.

“The statement was made to the effect that “........”

However, most of the above statements made by victims and E concerns the Defendant’s acts prior to the time indicated in the facts charged, and the remaining parts of the facts charged except the bathing theory are not indicated in the exercise of force, and the Defendant committed an act of disturbing drinking at the victim’s restaurant around February 14, 2018 (such as drinking disturbance, etc.).

arrow