logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.04.23 2014고단5527 (3)
공전자기록등불실기재등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the case of foreigners who are nationals of the People's Republic of China, the defendant used the fact that entry into the Republic of Korea can be made if they are registered on the citizen's family register of the Republic of Korea, and asked to inquire into the male of the Republic of Korea for the purpose of entry into the Republic of Korea, who live in the Republic of Korea.

B After receiving the Defendant’s request, “D” operated by Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and requested the Defendant to identify the number of men of the Republic of Korea who are to make a disguised marriage with the Defendant, upon receipt of the said request, C requested the said request to the E who was living together with the Defendant. E offered a disguised marriage to F who works for the same taxi company as himself/herself, and offered a disguised marriage with the Defendant, and F offered a disguised marriage with the intent to receive three million won in return for a disguised marriage, and F conspired in sequence with the Defendant to report a false marriage with the truth.

On April 8, 2008, the F had the above public official, who is aware of the fact, enter the marriage report and related documents in the name of the defendant and F in the family register information system of the above Gu office, into the true marriage and registered with the defendant and F in accordance with the above public offering, which was prepared as if the defendant and F were married with the truth by the public official in charge of the above Gu office of Nam-gu Incheon, Nam-gu, Incheon, which was located in 95, the German Government of the Republic of Korea. At that time, the F had the above public official, who was aware of the fact, enter them into the family register information system of the above public electronic records, into the true marriage and operated the family register information system.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, F, B, or C;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a marriage relation certificate, family relation certificate, and copy of marriage report;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow