A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On March 5, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Southern District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 9, 2015.

On February 22, 2015, at the defendant's house located in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Ctel 602, the defendant assaultsd D (13 years of age) who is the defendant's father, and the defendant was dispatched to the above site after receiving 112 reports from the Seoul Guro Police Station E-gu Seoul Police Station E-gu, the police officer of the E-gu Seoul Police Station, as well as G of the same circumstances. On February 2, 2015, the above police station's female juveniles and slope H (32 years of age) arrived at the scene and listens to the defendant and his father's statements, while the above slope I (41 years of age) arrived at the scene, the defendant was moving the defendant to his wife, and the above H moved moved the defendant into the house, and the above I got the defendant's wife hear the situation of the case from the corridor.

이에 피고인은 위 H에게 “니가 경찰관이냐, 신분증을 보여달라”라고 하고, 이에 위 H이 경찰관 신분증(공무원증)을 제시하자, 피고인은 이를 빼앗으려고 하면서 위 H의 가슴을 밀치고 팔을 잡아당기고, 계속하여 위 H을 집 밖으로 나가라면서 잡아끌고, 위 I이 이를 제지하려 하자, I에게도 신분증을 보여달라고 하여 위 I의 경찰관 신분증(공무원증)을 확인하였음에도, 상의를 벗으면서 “나는 태권도 5단인데 맞장을 뜨자”라고 말하면서 위 I의 멱살을 잡아 밀치고 팔꿈치로 위 I의 뺨을 1회 때리고 발로 위 I의 허벅지를 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement to I;

1. A H statement;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report criminal investigations;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act by universal title with respect to the relevant criminal facts;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and the former part of Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the fact that the defendant reflects on the probation).