Defendants shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, only 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

At around 23:50 on December 1, 2013, the Defendants reported that they were assaulted by the Defendants at “Eju” located in Sinpo City D on December 1, 2013, and reported that the slope G (the age 45) affiliated with the Mapo Police Station, who called the scene, was asked the reporter, to inquire him of the details of damage.

Accordingly, Defendant B expressed that “I am kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn't kn'

Then, Defendant B, on the front side of the aforesaid “Ejuk”, flabeded the flaps of slope I, and knicked the hand, and Defendant C, at the said “Ejuk’s store”, expressed the attitude of threatening the Kascker’s disease (330ml) and threatening the police officers dispatched to the site with their head, thereby threateninging any harm and injury.

As a result, the Defendants conspired and interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by police officers on the dispatch of 112 report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of the police against K;

1. Each police statement concerning H, J, G, I, and L;

1. Each written statement of J, G, I, and L;

1. Investigation report (type of beer and disease used by a suspect C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the scene of occurrence, and photographs of the damaged part of the victimJ (of all the defendants);

1. Articles 136 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine (the amount of a fine shall be reduced partially in consideration of the reflection of the punishment, the agreement with the victims, the age, career, family relationship, etc. of the Defendants);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;