The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B and C operate E E E E E E’s sexual surgery (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and Defendant D is a doctor working for Defendant hospital.

On February 14, 2019, the Plaintiff: (a) provided consultation on the basin expansion surgery with the Defendant Hospital on February 14, 2019; and (b) received a basin expansion surgery containing the solid form of Belgium on February 21, 2019 (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

B. On February 21, 2019, the Plaintiff received the instant treatment from Defendant D at Defendant Hospital, and Defendant D prescribed the Plaintiff for seven days of antibiotics after the instant treatment.

After the instant procedure, the Plaintiff was regularly treated as phishing, etc. at the Defendant Hospital, which was located in the Defendant Hospital. On February 28, 2019, the Plaintiff removed the diversity of the instant procedure.

(c)

The Plaintiff calls to the Defendant Hospital on March 11, 2019, and calls to the Defendant Hospital for about two days before approximately two days, and the right chests are left by the wintering Party.

was made.

On March 15, 2019, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant D observed the Plaintiff’s right side of the river, and the Plaintiff did not seem to have a large degree of opinion because it did not seem to have been much significant to the Plaintiff.

was made.

(d)

On March 20, 2019, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant D confirmed the Plaintiff’s condition, and explained that the Plaintiff may remove any square water due to the risk of infection, and prescribed seven-day antibiotics.

E. As the Plaintiff’s symptoms continue to exist until March 25, 2019, Defendant D continued to do so on March 27, 2019, Defendant D’s implementation of the method of removing protypes. On March 27, 2019, the Plaintiff received the method of removing protypes from the Defendant Hospital.

On the other hand, the Plaintiff was treated at F Hospital on March 26, 2019, and was conducted at the time of the instant medical treatment, and yellow spawn was dynamic in the examination for the cultivation of spawn of the parts of the instant medical treatment.

[Ground of recognition] In the absence of dispute, Gap evidence No. 1, Gap evidence No. 2, Eul evidence No. 1, and Eul evidence No. 1, the result of the court's entrustment of physical appraisal to G hospital heads of this court, and this court's H hospital heads of this court.