logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2021.02.10 2018나72560
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

A. The defendant shall pay KRW 9,495,633 to the plaintiff and KRW 6,00,000 among them.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a doctor of C Council member (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”).

On November 25, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant Hospital and received Stockholm, liter, and string procedure (hereinafter “instant procedure”) from the Defendant on the face and livers.

During the instant procedure, melting treatment is conducted in the direction of inserting the melting room into the sloping layer of the skin in the direction of desired by inserting it into the sloping of the skin.

B. On November 28, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant’s hospital to the right end, and the Defendant explained that it was such prior to the instant treatment.

On December 26, 2016, the Plaintiff visited the Defendant Hospital to the effect that “the Plaintiff was absent on the part of the instant medical treatment, and there was a scarb between the person subject to the quarantine, etc., and the person subject to the quarantine, etc.,” and the Defendant prescribed the antibiotics and ties to the Plaintiff.

On December 28, 2016, the Plaintiff did not visit the Defendant Hospital, and transmitted the Defendant’s pictures to the Defendant upon the Defendant’s request.

On December 30, 2016, the Plaintiff was admitted to the Defendant Hospital, and the Defendant instructed the Plaintiff to take advantage of the previously prescribed antibiotics.

On January 19, 2017, the Plaintiff: (a) was found to have performed the instant procedure for the Defendant at a higher level; and (b) was found to have been chested.

subsections were set forth.

The Defendant: (a) had the Plaintiff’s body of the instant medical treatment and scam, and (b) had the Defendant’s hospital scam back again on the following day.

On January 20, 2017, the Plaintiff did not establish the Defendant Hospital and resisted on January 21, 2017 as to the outbreak of a scarcity.

(c)

From January 22, 2017 to February 10, 2017, the Plaintiff received treatment for the unexplosion from a member of the D Council, from February 13, 2017 to May 30, 2017, and from a member of the E-Assessment Council, the E-Assessment took part in the treatment for the uncomplosion, and from the E-Assessment Council, the E-Assessment took part in the E-Assessment Review method.

(d)

On September 20, 2017, the Plaintiff, at the FEthician on September 20, 2017, fluorates excessive coloring after fluoral disease with respect to the part of the instant treatment.

arrow