(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.14 2014가합575738

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.14 2014가합575738

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The defendant is a doctor running D in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter "Defendant hospital"), and the plaintiff is a patient who has received local inhaled and transplant from the defendant at the above hospital.

B. On April 22, 2013, the Plaintiff collected a local area from the rear side of the buckbucks for local transplantation on April 22, 2013. After doing so, the Plaintiff first transferred to the Defendant hospital on the ground that the part of the buckbucks was cut off. On April 24, 2013, the Defendant received the local inhaleing and face-down on the part of the buckbucks and the part of the bucks. 2) on June 10, 2014, the Plaintiff again moved to the Defendant hospital on the ground that the part of the buckbucks and the part of the bucks were still used for the bucks and was consulted about the fact that the bucks were still used for the bucking.

3) On June 13, 2014, the Defendant: (a) Regional inhale and transplant surgery (hereinafter “instant treatment”) that transplants 10c and 225c c respectively on the buckbucks where the area collected by the Plaintiff’s side glass is 10c and 225c respectively on both chests.

4) After the instant procedure, the Defendant prescribed approximately 5 days, including the hatzidine, which is an antibiotictic agents.

C. On June 14, 2014, the day following the instant procedure: (a) on June 14, 2014, the day following the instant procedure: (b) the Plaintiff complained of the chest, and the Defendant was performing Healart treatment; (c) on June 16, 2014, on the upper part of the Plaintiff’s left chest; (d) on June 16, 2014, the Defendant deemed that the Defendant was a acute salt, and administered the antibiotic medication and performed the Healart treatment.

3) On June 17, 2014, the Plaintiff: (a) taken an anti-biotic medication at another hospital; (b) it was deemed that the Plaintiff was in charge of an anti-biotic medication. At the time, the fluoral part of the left chest was wide and the fluoral part of the upper left left was continued; (c) but, as a result of the fluoral test, the fluor was found in a small quantity; (d) on June 18, 2014, 2014, there was no significant change in the fluoral symptoms; and (d) the fluor’s opinion was reduced in the fluoral test; and

6.As of 19.19

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 2016.08.10 2014가단70685

-서울중앙지방법원 2018.06.29 2017나76854

-서울서부지방법원 2019.12.11 2018가합41894

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.04.14 2018가단5177222

-부산지방법원 2016.12.28 2014가합49114