1. The defendant's 11,149,700 won to the plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 21, 2020 to July 24, 2020 to the plaintiff.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiff 1) The defendant is a mutual hospital in Michuhol-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C and the second floor of the second floor (hereinafter "the defendant hospital").

(2) On December 22, 2015, the Plaintiff is a doctor operating the relevant river, and the Plaintiff was a person who received the relevant river basin extension surgery from the Defendant on December 22, 2015. (2) On December 11, 2015, the Plaintiff requested the Defendant to implement the relevant river basin extension surgery. On December 22, 2015, the Defendant decided to implement the relevant river basin extension surgery (hereinafter “instant surgery”).

Before the instant procedure, the Defendant conducted blood tests, etc. on the Plaintiff, and received written consent from the Plaintiff on December 22, 2015, and conducted the instant procedure.

3) On December 28, 2015, the Defendant removed the Plaintiff’s actual boomed boomed by the Plaintiff. From January 5, 2016, the Plaintiff asserted that there was a pain on the left-hand bank, and the Defendant confirmed that there was a pain on the left-hand bank. Accordingly, the Defendant got the Plaintiff to conduct disinfection, the first household antibioticsing, and spawning. (B) The Defendant continued to conduct disinfection and antibioticsing on the left-hand bank. (3) On January 19, 2016, the Defendant continued to conduct the Plaintiff’s treatment to remove spawn inserted on the left-hand bank. (3) On the left-hand bank, the Defendant observed the progress of the Plaintiff and subsequently decided whether to reinjecte spawn.

2) On February 16, 2016, the Defendant had the Plaintiff undergo a so-wave test at the Einematographic Institute. As a result of the said test, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff had a so-called satison in the left bank of the Plaintiff. Accordingly, even though the Defendant implemented an saton alcohol to the Plaintiff and continued to administer an antibiotic, the Plaintiff’s symptoms aggravated with satisfy. The Defendant conducted a saton test on the Plaintiff’s body on February 22, 2016, but did not spread the satisfy at the Plaintiff’s body. (iii) The Defendant thereafter did not spread the satisfy in the Plaintiff’s body.