logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.02.14 2013고정1271
장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant and B purchased the lost portable phone, which the victims gets on the taxi, to resell it, and B purchased the lost portable phone from the taxi driver by skeing the name from the street, and the Defendant offered to resell it after passing it.

1. B, around 01:00 on October 3, 2012, sent a signal to the effect that a cell phone is purchased on the street near the exit of the Hong-gu Seoul Mapo-gu Hong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on his hand and then sent the signal to the effect that a cell phone is purchased by scaming it by means of scaming, and then purchased at KRW 50,000,000,000 from a taxi driver on his name, who is the victim C that he embezzled, in awareness of the fact that he is a stolen price of KRW 9,00,000,000,000,000,000,000 won, even though he was aware of the fact that the victim’s non-scam is a stolen price of KRW 9,00,00,000,000

2. B, at around 02:00 on October 4, 2012, at the same place as Paragraph (1) and in the same manner as Paragraph (1), purchased 100,000 won from the victim D, who he embezzled from a taxi driver on his name, and the victim E-owned market price of KRW 900,000,00,000, in awareness of the fact that galgal lus are stolen, and the Defendant acquired stolen goods from B.

3. B, around October 4, 2012, around 03:20, purchased 130,000 won from the taxi driver G with knowledge of the fact that the value of 4S 1,000 won from the victim H, he embezzled from the taxi driver G in the same manner as Paragraph 1, at the front of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the Defendant acquired stolen goods from Defendant B.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired five cell phone units with a total of 4.5 million won in collusion with B, with knowledge of fact that they are stolen goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the accused, B, or G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to records of seizure, list of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow