Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Provided, That each of the above punishments shall be executed for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants have placed an advertisement "purchase of popon, learningphone, and direct trade of unpaidphones" on the Internet car page of NAV and have people purchase stolen goods for business purposes.

1. On January 23, 2013, the Defendants: (a) purchased stolen goods in KRW 2.30,000 of the price knowing that the market price, which was the ownership of a person without a name, purchased from D, in front of the Suwon-si apartment, is a charge for a gallon ju City smartphone 3 smartphone 1, which was owned by him; and (b) acquired stolen goods.

2. At around 02:30 on January 25, 2013, the Defendants acquired stolen goods by purchasing 80,000 won, knowing that the market price, which was the ownership of a person with no name, was owned by G, in front of the F High School located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, Ulsan-si, Busan-si.

3. At around 20:00 on February 7, 2013, the Defendants purchased stolen goods in KRW 2.80,000 of the price with knowledge of the fact that the market value of a person who was stolen from H, which was the one million won possession of a person who was in possession of a person who was stolen from H, from a baltho-galthal road located in the Dong-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si.

4. The Defendants, around 18:00 on February 26, 2013, purchased stolen goods from I in front of the offset path in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, Nowon-gu, by purchasing KRW 200,00 of the price knowing that the market price of the victim J-owned by I was the stolen goods.

5. The Defendants, around 15:00 on March 10, 2013, purchased stolen goods at KRW 100,000,000 after being aware of the fact that the market price, which is the ownership of a person without a name, was owned by M, in front of the L High School located in Seoul K, was the market price of 4 smartphone 1.0,00 won.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to acquire stolen goods.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police interrogation protocol of the Defendants, H, D, M, I, and G

1. Each police statement made to N orO;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Investigative intelligence reports, each investigation report, respectively.