beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor of one year and six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor of four months.
(2) the date of this judgment.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A
A. The Defendant, along with I and J, opened a mobile phone sales store “H” with the Defendant: (a) opened a mobile phone in the name of the nominal owner using a forged identification file; (b) opened a mobile phone in the name of the nominal owner; and (c) gathered to receive profits from selling a used mobile phone purchaser, etc.; (c) the Defendant secured a forged identification file from K to secure profits from disposing of a falsified mobile phone and a deep-depth chip; (d) the role of securing profits from disposing of a forged identification file; (e) the I opened a mobile phone by forging the application for membership under his/her name while driving the store business; (e) the J conspired to manage a forged identification file as an employee of a sales store; and (e) to open a mobile phone by forging the application for membership.
(1) On January 6, 2014, in collusion with I and J, the Defendant: (a) written the following as “M”, “N” in the resident registration number column, “N” in the applicant column, and “M” column in the applicant column with a view to using a forged identification file secured by K at the Ha Government-si L’s cellphone sales store; and (b) written at will a copy of the application for the purchase of a personal document in the name of M, which is a private document, in relation to the rights and obligations, by signing on the name following the request column.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with I and J, forged a letter of application for membership in M without authority, and forged a private document, such as a total number of 77 applications for number change and a new application for membership, from around December 11, 2013 to January 24, 2014, according to the foregoing method, as stated in the attached list I.
B. On January 6, 2014, the Defendant was in collusion with I and J to commit the instant investigation document, and around January 6, 2014, at the above “H” mobile phone sales store, the Defendant was aware of the forged M M M’s application for joining the said document through the P’s representative Q.