logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2020.03.26 2020고단14
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, while misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions, obtained the proposal of the telephone financial fraud (tentatively referred to as the “scam”), which deceivings the victims to take part in the scaming crime by accepting the proposal of the name and unscambs who are the constituent causes of the organization, and conspired in order to take charge of the role of inducing the victims to the effect that, by misrepresenting himself/herself or by telephone to many and unspecified persons, he/she deceptions himself/herself to the employees of financial institutions, “to cause a low interest rate when he/she pays an existing loan”, and the Defendant directly conspireds the victims to take charge of the role of remitting cash in the name of the existing loan repayment to the account designated by another organization (tentatively referred to as “cambing”).

On January 2, 2020, the official under the name of the Minister of Trade, Industry and Energy made a false statement to the effect that “A loan will be made at a low interest rate if an existing loan is repaid” to the victim C while misrepresenting the employees of the Bank at a non-place on January 2, 2020. The existing loan repayment will be delivered to B Bank employees at the site.”

On January 2, 2020, the Defendant sent KRW 9,345,00,00 to the account designated by the bearers of name, while taking account of the fact that the victim, who had withdrawn cash from the account in accordance with the aforementioned false statement, was an employee of the lending company, at the time of March 14, 2020.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the staff of the singishing operations, acquired the property from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. A medical certificate and a written result of autopsy;

1. Details of the Kakao Stockholm dialogue;

1. A report on internal investigation (with respect to the confirmation ofCCTV and the process of arresting a suspect), CCTV closure photographs;

1. A report on investigation (related to photographing photographs of telephone records) and a photograph of telephone recording;

1. The investigation report F.

arrow