beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and six months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, while misrepresenting the employees of financial institutions, conspired with the victim to take part in the singing crime by obtaining a proposal of the name and incompact, which is the cause of the organization of the telephone financial fraud (hereinafter referred to as “singing”), which deceivings the victims by deceiving him/her, to the effect that he/she, by misrepresenting himself/herself or by deceiving himself/herself to a large number of unspecified persons, “to cause a substitute loan at a low interest rate if he/she pays an existing loan,” and the Defendant is to take charge of the role of remitting money to another account designated by another organization (hereinafter referred to as “exclusive collection obligation”) after he/she directly receives cash in the name of the existing loan repayment from the victim.
1. On June 11, 2020, the non-name scam assistance employee misrepresented the victim C with a false statement to the effect that “First, upon obtaining a loan by d card loan, if the existing loan is repaid at a low interest rate, the victim would be granted a loan of KRW 10 million in a d card loan loan,” and the victim reported to the Financial Supervisory Service that “the victim would obtain a loan from B bank and use d card loan loan loan loan by d card loan loan loan, and thereby disrupt the order by using the d card loan loan loan loan loan.” The victim may cancel the report as a violation of the Financial Transactions Act that should be paid in full by 10 million won in the d card loan loan loan loan.”
At around 11:30 on June 17, 2020, the Defendant: (a) received cash from the victim from the end of the aforementioned false statement; and (b) remitted KRW 9.5 million, excluding KRW 500,000,000,000,000 for allowances, to the account designated by his name in secret.
2. On June 17, 2020, the official who continues to engage in singing the name of the employee is not in a situation with the reduction of the fee to the victim.