logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.06.25 2014고단1235
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, for ten months, and for six months, for each of the defendants C.

except that this shall not apply.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A, Defendant B, and Defendant C [Interference with the performance of official duties, Violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury)] Defendant A tried to commit violence against K around May 1, 2014 at the top of G cafeteria located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, while receiving 112 reports and being dispatched to the site by I, and Do assistant J, even though they were dispatched to the site.

In the above I and J, they were able to see that “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am.

Defendant

B는 K의 승용차 앞을 가로막고 있다가 위 J이 도로 밖으로 끌어내려고 하자 바닥에 드러눕고 주먹으로 위 J의 얼굴 부위를 1회 때리고, 발로 위 J의 다리 부위를 수회 걷어찼다.

Defendant

C turned the body of the above J, which the defendant A is under his control, over the floor by fasting the body of the J.

As a result, the Defendants jointly interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers regarding the suppression and prevention of crimes, and at the same time, the victimsJ (the age of 48) suffered bodily injury such as damage to the sacrrony that requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

2. Defendant A [Obstruction of Performance of Official Duties] On May 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant as a flagrant offender on the street in front of the said G cafeteria, and was transferred to the criminal department and office of the Seoul Cranam Police Station in front of the said G cafeteria, and (b) obstructed the saidJ’s legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and prevention of the police officer’s crime by walking the BJ’s platform one time due to the Plaintiff’s occurrence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to J and I;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provision on criminal facts: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act, and Article 2(2)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act.

arrow