2017Nu75899 Revocation of Disposition Rejecting Information Disclosure

A

Plame

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2015Guhap6493 decided September 8, 2017

November 30, 2017

December 14, 2017

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

The defendant's refusal to disclose information on June 8, 2015 to the plaintiff is revoked.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of the first instance judgment

The reasoning for the court’s explanation on the instant case is the same as that of the judgment of the first instance, and therefore, it is accepted in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act (the grounds asserted by the defendant in the appeal of this court are not significantly different from that of the defendant’s assertion in the first instance court, and even if all the evidence presented in the first instance court are examined, the judgment of the first instance court rejecting the defendant’s assertion

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is justified, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

The presiding judge, judge and assistant judge;

Judges Park Jong-young

Judges Lee Jong-hwan

A person shall be appointed.